Epiginoskein

A Neo-Calvinist's musings on theology, philosophy, and history.

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Why I am a Neo-Calvinist...

I was out on a brisk holiday walk this afternoon when I began to reflect on my life and the path that has led me to call myself a "neo-Calvinist."

Some of you may be aware of my background. Others of you may be surprised to learn that I did not grow up Reformed. My Christian walk began in fundamentalism (yes, the wild-eyed,legalistic, "Left Behind" type)and later moved briefly into Pentecostalism. These two camps are inherently anti-culture and shy away from interaction with the "world" (I'm sure some people will find this stereotype unfair, but overall I think it is accurate). In high school I encountered the five points of Calvinism under the influence of a Reformed Baptist pastor. Unfortunately, this pastor was a hyper-Calvinist and strongly antagonistic toward any Christian tradition which smacked of "Arminianism" (for the record I also have problems with Arminianism but am disturbed by some Calvinists' inability to think about anything beyond the five points). In addition one of my good friends (a local Christian book store owner) was doing a lot of reading in the Roman Catholic mystics and early church fathers. Naturally, being a hyper-Calvinist I was attracted to the esoteric piety of people like St. John of the Cross or Miguel Molinias. Here were people who took Christianity seriously and were unaffected by shallow North American Arminianism.

The practical result of this cross of hyper-Calvinism and Catholic mysticism in my life was a morbid introspective spirit characterized by a hatred of creation. Strangely enough, during this time I lived almost like a Protestant monk. I spent a great deal of time reading theology (mainly books by Puritans, etc.) and studying Greek in isolation only to become more and more self-engrossed. Like every good hyper-Calvinist, I was worried about my election. I could see from my personal habits and tendencies that I was very far from being a perfect individual.

Thankfully, after a few years of this, my family broke away from the paranoid Reformed Baptist pastor (essentially a church split with all of the anathemas directed at my family). As I recovered from a "we-are-the-elect-and-there-are-no-others" mentality, I found comfort in the writings of Charles Spurgeon and John Bunyan. However, I was still very much opposed to culture and suspicious of doing anything besides Bible reading, praying, etc. After all, these were the only things which really mattered in life. Work, play, and everything else which was not purposefully Christian was at best "physical" and "worldly." To sum it all up, I was a recovering gnostic.

After high school I enrolled at Dordt College because it seemed to be a good solid Calvinistic institution. Imagine my shock when many of these Dutch "Calvinists" had no clue what the five points of Calvinism were. However, by God's grace I had come to study history, and the entire history department was filled with Neo-Calvinists who confessed the Canons of Dordt but also pushed me to think about the goodness of creation and the need for a Christian worldview. It was here that I read books by Al Wolters, Abraham Kuyper, Herman Dooyeweerd, etc. Keeping in mind my essentially gnostic background, Neo-Calvinism liberated me to think as a Christian and live as a true human being (no more ranting about how horrible it was to be a "soul trapped in a body!").

Since that time, I have continued to call myself a Neo-Calvinist and work within Neo-Calvinism's intellectual tradition.

So that's it...that's why I would call myself a Neo-Calvinist.

continue reading Why I am a Neo-Calvinist...

Monday, December 25, 2006

A Christmas thought...

The other day in class Prof. Muller (i.e. Richard Muller, the fellow who has written a good deal on post-reformation Protestant scholasticism) made the observation that Martin Luther loved to preach at Christmas. Apparently, Luther's favorite text for the occasion was "and they wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger." The reason for this was that Luther enjoyed reminding his hearers that "swaddling clothes" were essentially diapers.

From this he pointed out to his hearers that Christians often approach the Christmas story without really seeing the scandal of it all. We imagine happy little manger scenes and miss the powerful stumbling block of the Incarnation.

After all, it seems strange to talk about Jesus dirtying his diapers (perhaps even blasphemous!). Yet the truth is that the Incarnation is a tremendous mystery which we must pause over in all of its scandal. The Almighty God of the Covenants has stepped into time as a creature to restore harmony to creation.

May we all once again re-observe the Stone of stumbling!

continue reading A Christmas thought...

Monday, December 18, 2006

Jonah 1 and the "Sea"...

In my introduction to Hebrew Exegesis class, we have been going through the book of Jonah. There are some fascinating things in the Hebrew text which do not come through in the English translation. For example, in the first chapter the sea plays a prominent role. Jonah flees from the presence of YHWH into a ship heading to Tarshish, but YHWH hurls a great wind upon the sea. Naturally, the sea responds and terrifies the sailors of the vessel. They each call on their gods and cast the cargo into the sea, but nothing seems to work. After waking Jonah up (he's been sleeping hard in the recesses of the ship) they cast lots and find out Jonah is to blame. After a barrage of questions, Jonah tells them that he is a fearer of YHWH, the God who made both sea and dry land.

Now as 21st century western people, we read this story and think, "Hmm...the sailors where scared of capsizing so they jettisoned their cargo...Hmm...Jonah's God is vindicated as the true God because He is powerful over nature..." However, this is not how the story would have been heard by ancient people. The Hebrew word used for sea in chapter one (and note that it is used almost exclusively in chapter one) is "Yam." In the ancient world, Yam was a powerful god of the chaotic sea. He was the opponent of Baal. So when we read that the sailors are throwing their cargo overboard, we should not imagine that they are trying to make the ship more managable (You only jettison cargo if the ship is near the shallows. Out at sea lightening the ship makes it very difficult to control). They are, in fact, offering sacrifices to appease Yam (v. 5 actually means that they were trying to lighten Yam's anger, not that their intention was to lighten the ship--a common mistranslation). Thus, Jonah's confession of faith not only serves to drive the story forward but also underlines a theme of critique which has been building in chapter 1: YHWH alone is God!

continue reading Jonah 1 and the "Sea"...

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Confirmation in the Catholic Tradition...

Today I was studying the Catholic Catechism for my class in Roman Catholic Theology, when I discovered the theological underpinnings for "confirmation." I had always been under the impression that confirmation differed little from Reformed Christianity's profession of faith or the Baptist's understanding of baptism. However, there is a distinct difference. Confirmation is based upon the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Catholics believe that just as the apostles laid hands on those who had been baptized for the reception of the Holy Spirit, even so priests "confirm" a person's baptism with anointing, etc.

It is an interesting theory, but its validity is based upon one's understanding of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. At this point I am inclined to argue that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit was upon the institutional church as a whole (with divine re-enactments of this taking place among different ethnic groups). Nonetheless, it is something to ponder.

continue reading Confirmation in the Catholic Tradition...

Monday, December 11, 2006

For those of you who wonder what I look like...




A handsome bloke playing around with iphoto!

continue reading For those of you who wonder what I look like...

Saturday, December 09, 2006

Libronix or Accordance (or any other options)?

Well, I just broke down and bought my first laptop computer for exegetical work. After looking over the options, I decided that my best bet was a Mac. However, now I have a bit of a dilemma. Libronix (which is Calvin Seminary's favorite exegetical/library program) is still working on a Mac version. I could go through the steps of installing Windows XP on my computer and running Libronix off of that, or I could go with Accordance, a Mac program which is a few hundred dollars cheaper but does not have all of the "extras."

I am curious if anyone out there has any thoughts on the subject. Any other good exegetical programs, etc.?

continue reading Libronix or Accordance (or any other options)?